Re: Slow readers

Posted by sue/pa (kostalas) on February 7, 2008, 5:27 am, in reply to "Re: Slow readers"
71.114.129.4

.... My opinion is that a reader : is caused by a LO that the borrowers : don't completely trust. .. While that may be partially true, and the fact that some people are going to read every word because that's their nature, I'd bet that the majority of readers are caused by inept 'signing agents'.

---

Message Thread: Slow readers - marv/ca February 6, 2008, 1:06 pm Re: Slow readers - Glenn / CA February 7, 2008, 12:21 am Re: Slow readers - sue/pa February 7, 2008, 5:27 am Re: Slow readers - Glenn / CA February 7, 2008, 10:38 am Re: Slow readers - Craig / CA February 7, 2008, 11:04 am Re: Slow readers - Amy in CA February 6, 2008, 5:46 pm Re: Slow readers - WendySoCal February 6, 2008, 4:32 pm That sounds awful ewee...... n/m - Amy in CA February 6, 2008, 5:44 pm Facilitate as best you can - Kelly R/So Cal February 6, 2008, 1:25 pm PAW's First Ten - PAW/FL February 7, 2008, 8:42 am Re Kelly's First Five - CA notary February 6, 2008, 11:23 pm John's First Five - John Cown - Connecticut February 7, 2008, 5:55 am Linda's First Three - LindaH February 7, 2008, 7:49 am Re: John's Fifth - John Cown - Connecticut February 7, 2008, 6:13 am I always say I have another appointment - Tam February 7, 2008, 1:12 pm « Back to thread

---

Post a Response